Misdefining the Challenge Cannot Solve Not Racism

 There is a problem with our societies system of welfare.

A couple of things, first we know that families that have a male figure in the household have a better probability of their children becoming more successful adults, i.e. avoiding the criminal justice system. Second, there is a finance cost to raising children the welfare system provides for that a family accordingly. In other words, the more children you have the more money you receive as your benefit There is a break even level but,that is a money management level that isn't sustainable, expenses happen- life's lottery if you will. The welfare system does not allow the fathers, the male figure, to reside in the household, as he would become a part of the family unit or on welfare himself, He would not be eligible for benefits, no one has figured out what happens if he identifies as a female what the consequences of that might be. That is a topic for another blog. 

We have a system that waves a carrot, more money for more children, and denies the children the benefits of a father figure in the household. If he's living there then the money goes away. The welfare system has created it's own catch 22, the result is our prison population goes upward. 

Since these rules apply to all women, regardless of skin pigmentation, it is NOT a RACIAL ISSUE. It does come down to personal decision making and individual responsibility, there will always be exceptions, life happens. Calling this a racial issue says that one race is inadequate to make good personal decisions and is unable to be individually responsible.That is Racist by its very definition.

Is there a way to have the father figure in the household and maintain the benefits of livability level of the cash necessary to raise the child? 

Historically, the community or the community of churches took care of the families that were unable to manage the finances of life. Then it became government's business and government used the money that the working class were putting into the Social Security to pay for these children and the mess exploded.  

Is the challenge systemic? Is the system the challenge?

We take the Integrity of our Vote

 On a national radio talk show the host indicated that the outcome of the election audits in several states would not have the desired results of the caller which was to replace the current Joe basing the host opinion the fact that we elect electoral voters in November and not the actual candidate (the American version of proxies). That the certification process which turned into the fiasco of January 6th was when the actual election became official at midnight. The host did go on to say that there were a couple of ways, to rid our country of  Joe, and this is a paraphrase was the grime reaper or impeachment or the ballot box in 2024. That the purpose of the state audits was to embarrass the democratic party into oblivion, that assumes a moral compass which is a faulty morality that does not exist. 

Impeachment is a long road. Watergate was a long and painful road. Especially when it includes the POTUS, V-P and the Congress that voted in favor of the certification of the November election, without regard to whether they were proxies or candidates. Whether they were implicit or explicit, i.e. the lookout guy at a bank hold-up where a teller is shot and killed is also guilty of murder of that teller. They are all candidates for charges of treason charges. They ALL took an Oath to Protect and Defend and have done their best to smear and covert the Constitution of the United States. That Oath extends for a Lifetime-and in one form or another, extends from POTUS down to the poll workers.